Holland & Hart's Health Law Blog
  • Publications
  • Webinar Recordings
    • 2026 Webinar Recordings
    • 2025 Webinar Recordings
    • 2024 Webinar Recordings
    • 2023 Webinar Recordings
    • 2022 Webinar Recordings
    • 2021 Webinar Recordings
    • 2020 Webinar Recordings
    • 2019 Webinar Recordings
    • 2018 Webinar Recordings
    • 2017 Webinar Recordings
    • 2016 Webinar Recordings
  • Compliance Bootcamps
  • Attorneys
  • Healthcare Law
  • Employers’ Lawyers Blog
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Public Health Emergency Ends May 11, 2023: Check Your Readiness

March 20, 2023/in COVID-19

By Kim Stanger

After three years, the federal public health emergency (PHE) will expire May 11, 2023.1 Most of the relaxed regulatory and payor standards will end on or within a few months after the deadline, including many relating to:

  • Federal subsidies for PHE-related services.
  • Medicare coverage and/or the amount of reimbursement for certain services, especially COVID-related care and telehealth services.
  • Medicaid coverage for COVID-related services.
  • Flexibility on standards relating to patient stays (e.g., use of skilled nursing facility (SNF) beds for patients who do not meet SNF criteria; critical access hospital (CAH) 25-bed and/or 96-hour length of stay requirements; etc.).
  • Facility safety, staffing, and operational standards.
  • Use of alternative or expansion sites to provide care (e.g., Hospitals Without Walls Programs; use of other sites to render hospital services; etc.).
  • Practitioner supervision requirements.
  • Charges and cost-sharing amounts for certain services, including COVID testing.
  • Prescribing controlled substances through telehealth services as otherwise governed by the Ryan Haight Act.
  • Use of non-HIPAA compliant modalities to conduct telehealth visits.
  • Stark, Anti-Kickback Statute, and Civil Monetary Penalties waivers concerning arrangements with physicians, patients, and other referral sources.
  • EMTALA guidelines concerning directing patients to other locations.
  • PREP Act liability protections.2

Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 Kim Stanger https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png Kim Stanger2023-03-20 14:07:142023-03-20 14:07:14Public Health Emergency Ends May 11, 2023: Check Your Readiness

Idaho Abortion Laws: Updated FAQs

January 17, 2023/in Idaho Healthcare Law

By Kim Stanger

On January 5, 2023, the Idaho Supreme Court upheld Idaho’s near-total abortion ban (I.C. § 18-622), Idaho’s fetal heartbeat (“6-week”) abortion ban to the extent it is not superseded by the near-total abortion ban (I.C. § 18-8804), and Idaho’s Texas-style civil liability statute (I.C. § 18-8807).1 Anyone who performs an abortion of a clinically diagnosable pregnancy is guilty of a felony unless the abortion is necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman or in the case of rape or incest.2 The total abortion ban is currently subject to an important exception: on August 24, 2022, the United States District Court of Idaho entered a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the total abortion ban in cases in which the Emergency Medical Transport and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) would require hospital-affiliated providers to perform an abortion to protect the health of the mother.3 Given these developments, we have updated our answers to common questions concerning Idaho’s abortion laws. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 Kim Stanger https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png Kim Stanger2023-01-17 14:03:572023-01-17 14:03:57Idaho Abortion Laws: Updated FAQs

Idaho Abortion Laws: Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Laws but Offers Important Clarifications

January 11, 2023/in Idaho Healthcare Law

By Kim Stanger

On January 5, 2023, the Idaho Supreme Court upheld Idaho’s near Total Abortion Ban (I.C. § 18-622), its 6-Week Abortion Ban (I.C. 18-8804 to -8805), and its related Civil Liability Law (I.C. § 18-8807). Planned Parenthood v. State of Idaho, No. 49615, 49817, 49899 (Idaho 1/5/23) (“Opinion”), available here. Those laws are discussed more fully in our client alert titled Idaho Abortion Laws: New Law and EMTALA Exception Now Effective. However, in its recent opinion, the Court included several important clarifications. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 Kim Stanger https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png Kim Stanger2023-01-11 14:01:092023-01-11 14:01:09Idaho Abortion Laws: Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Laws but Offers Important Clarifications

Mandatory Disclosures for Healthcare Workers Under Idaho Law

December 15, 2022/in HIPAA, Idaho Healthcare Law

By Kim Stanger

The HIPAA privacy rules allow healthcare providers to disclose protected health information to the extent another state or federal law or regulation requires it:

A covered entity may use or disclose protected health information to the extent that such use or disclosure is required by law and the use or disclosure complies with and is limited to the relevant requirements of such law.1

(45 C.F.R. § 164.512(a)(1)). Importantly, HIPAA only allows such disclosures if the other law requires the disclosure, not if the other law simply allows disclosures. (78 FR 5618). In cases where another law permits but does not require disclosure, HIPAA would preempt the other law and prohibit the disclosure unless another HIPAA exception applied. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2022-12-15 09:36:042022-12-15 09:36:04Mandatory Disclosures for Healthcare Workers Under Idaho Law

HHS Extends Deadline for Co-Provider Requirements Under the No Surprise Billing Rules

December 5, 2022/in No Surprise Billing

By Kim Stanger

As discussed in our November 28 client alert, the No Surprise Billing Rules (NSBR) require that convening providers contact co-providers and include co-provider fees in the convening provider’s good faith estimate to uninsured (self-pay) patients. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2022-12-05 14:53:112022-12-05 14:53:11HHS Extends Deadline for Co-Provider Requirements Under the No Surprise Billing Rules
Page 9 of 48«‹7891011›»

Idaho Patient Act Timeline


View our Idaho Patient Act Timeline Guide

Holland & Hart

This blog is maintained by the Health Law practice group of Holland & Hart LLP. Visit the Holland & Hart website.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Enter your Email:

Contact

If you have any questions, please contact Kim Stanger.

More COVID-19 Articles


View more COVID-related articles on our Labor & Employment Blog

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright 2026 | Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold WordPress Theme by Kriesi
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top