Holland & Hart's Health Law Blog
  • Publications
  • Webinar Recordings
    • 2026 Webinar Recordings
    • 2025 Webinar Recordings
    • 2024 Webinar Recordings
    • 2023 Webinar Recordings
    • 2022 Webinar Recordings
    • 2021 Webinar Recordings
    • 2020 Webinar Recordings
    • 2019 Webinar Recordings
    • 2018 Webinar Recordings
    • 2017 Webinar Recordings
    • 2016 Webinar Recordings
  • Compliance Bootcamps
  • Attorneys
  • Healthcare Law
  • Employers’ Lawyers Blog
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Archive for category: Providers

Navigating Utah’s Expanded Peer Review Privilege: A Roadmap for Healthcare Providers

July 15, 2025/in Providers

By Kristy M. Kimball

The term “peer review privilege” generally refers to a discovery and evidentiary privilege that can be asserted by hospitals and other healthcare entities to protect the confidentiality of credentialing, quality improvement, and similar peer review activities. While the specific scope, application, and requirements of the peer review privilege vary by state, the underlying purpose is consistent: to foster a protected environment where healthcare professionals and institutions can engage in honest, constructive dialogue and conduct thorough inquiry aimed at improving patient care and clinical performance—without fear that such discussions or findings will be used against them in court.

To gain peer review privilege, healthcare institutions and professionals must ensure that their peer review processes strictly align with the requirements of their state’s peer review privilege laws. Otherwise, in a legal proceeding (e.g., a medical malpractice case involving an underlying incident for which a hospital conducted peer review), a judge may rule that peer review privilege is inapplicable and allow sensitive and unfavorable peer review information and documents to be introduced into evidence.  Accordingly, it is imperative for those involved to clearly understand their state’s peer review privilege laws. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2025-07-15 14:49:332025-11-10 14:52:24Navigating Utah’s Expanded Peer Review Privilege: A Roadmap for Healthcare Providers

Physicians and Other Healthcare Providers: Beware “Eat What You Kill” Compensation Models

March 31, 2023/in Providers

By Kim Stanger

Physicians and other healthcare providers often structure their group compensation formulas on an “eat what you kill” basis, i.e., a provider is paid based on the services he or she performs in addition to items or services they order, prescribe, refer, sell, etc. Such formulas must be reviewed, structured, or revised appropriately to ensure compliance with federal fraud and abuse laws, including Stark, the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), and the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act (EKRA). Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 Kim Stanger https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png Kim Stanger2023-03-31 14:09:112023-03-31 14:09:11Physicians and Other Healthcare Providers: Beware “Eat What You Kill” Compensation Models

Gifts to Patients and Referring Providers

December 1, 2022/in Providers

By Kim Stanger

At this time of year, healthcare providers may want to give gifts to patients, referring providers, or other sources of business, but such gifts may violate federal and state fraud and abuse laws and result in civil or criminal fines for both the giver and receiver. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2022-12-01 16:00:532022-12-01 16:00:53Gifts to Patients and Referring Providers

Small Win for Healthcare Providers: CMS Issues New Guidance under No Surprise Billing Rules and DHHS’ Appeal

April 26, 2022/in Providers

By Allison (Ally) Kjellander and Kim Stanger

On April 12, 2022, CMS issued new guidance1 for the independent dispute resolution (“IDR”) process under the No Surprise Billing Rules (“Rules”) in response to a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas judge vacating an insurer-friendly provision,2 handing a small win to healthcare providers. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2022-04-26 15:59:382025-01-21 09:58:01Small Win for Healthcare Providers: CMS Issues New Guidance under No Surprise Billing Rules and DHHS’ Appeal

No Surprise Billing Rules: Good Faith Estimates and Unscheduled Services

January 7, 2022/in Providers, Reimbursement & Collections

By Kim Stanger

The No Surprise Billing Rules took effect January 1, 2022, but many questions remain, including if and to what extent the new rules for good faith estimates apply to items or services that are provided to self-pay patients on an unscheduled basis, such as emergency, urgent care, or walk-in patients. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2022-01-07 15:29:402022-01-07 15:29:40No Surprise Billing Rules: Good Faith Estimates and Unscheduled Services
Page 1 of 3123

Idaho Patient Act Timeline


View our Idaho Patient Act Timeline Guide

Holland & Hart

This blog is maintained by the Health Law practice group of Holland & Hart LLP. Visit the Holland & Hart website.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Enter your Email:

Contact

If you have any questions, please contact Kim Stanger.

More COVID-19 Articles


View more COVID-related articles on our Labor & Employment Blog

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright 2026 | Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold WordPress Theme by Kriesi
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top