Holland & Hart's Health Law Blog
  • Publications
  • Webinar Recordings
    • 2025 Webinar Recordings
    • 2024 Webinar Recordings
    • 2023 Webinar Recordings
    • 2022 Webinar Recordings
    • 2021 Webinar Recordings
    • 2020 Webinar Recordings
    • 2019 Webinar Recordings
    • 2018 Webinar Recordings
    • 2017 Webinar Recordings
    • 2016 Webinar Recordings
  • Compliance Bootcamps
  • Attorneys
  • Healthcare Law
  • Employers’ Lawyers Blog
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

What Healthcare Providers Need to Know About EKRA

March 19, 2019/in Healthcare Law

By Eric Maxfield

In October 2018, the President signed the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act, a portion of which is known as the “Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act of 2018” or “EKRA.” EKRA, aimed at the ongoing opioid crisis, is meant to prevent patient brokering, referrals, and kickbacks related to drug recovery and substance abuse treatment centers. EKRA’s language, however, is very broad and goes well beyond the opioid crisis to deal with “patient brokering,” which is when a substance abuse facility or provider pays a third party for referring or directing potential patients. EKRA violations carry significant penalties, including fines upwards of $200,000 per “occurrence,” as well as significant prison time.

While EKRA’s purpose is to address kickbacks related to the broader issues surrounding opioids, it is not limited exclusively to treatment centers per se. Instead, EKRA precludes the solicitation or receipt of value for referrals to recovery homes, clinical treatment centers, or laboratories. EKRA applies to public and – importantly – private commercial health benefit programs. This is effectively an expansion of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute’s prohibition on kickbacks involving individuals covered by federal programs like Medicare, Medicaid, or TRICARE.

Read more
https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2019-03-19 16:40:382019-03-19 16:40:38What Healthcare Providers Need to Know About EKRA

Common Stark Concerns for Hospitals

March 14, 2019/in Compliance, Fraud and Abuse

by Kim Stanger

Unless structured properly, a hospital’s financial relationship with referring physicians or other providers may violate the federal Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (“Stark”) and Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), resulting in civil and criminal fines, penalties, and repayments. Under Stark, if a hospital has a financial relationship with a physician, the physician may not refer patients to the hospital for certain designated health services1 payable by Medicare or Medicaid unless the arrangement fits within a regulatory safe harbor. (42 USC § 1395dd; 42 CFR § 411.353). The AKS generally prohibits knowingly offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce referrals for items or services payable by federal healthcare programs unless the arrangement fits within a regulatory safe harbor. (42 USC § 1320a-7b(b); 42 CFR § 1001.952). Below are some of the top compliance concerns arising from relationships with referring providers:

1. No Written Agreement. Except for employment arrangements, Stark and the AKS generally require that financial arrangements are documented in writing and signed by the parties, including arrangements involving the payment for services, sale or lease of space or equipment, recruitment subsidies, etc. (See, e.g., 42 CFR §§ 411.357(a), (b), (d), (e), (l), (p), (y), and 1001.952(b)-(d)). CMS has confirmed that a single formal contract is not necessarily required; instead, “a collection of documents, including contemporaneous documents evidencing the course of conduct between the parties, may satisfy the writing requirement…” (80 FR 71315).

Read more
https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2019-03-14 15:33:352019-03-14 15:33:35Common Stark Concerns for Hospitals

Telehealth: Practicing Across the Idaho Border

February 12, 2019/in Telehealth

by Kim Stanger

More healthcare practitioners are using telehealth to render patient care or expand their practices. When telehealth crosses state borders, the practitioner must ensure that he or she is licensed in or otherwise authorized to practice medicine in the state where the patient resides. The Model Policy issued by the Federation of State Medical Boards states:

A physician must be licensed, or under the jurisdiction, of the medical board of the state where the patient is located. The practice of medicine occurs where the patient is located at the time telemedicine technologies are used. Physicians who treat or prescribe through online services sites are practicing medicine and must possess appropriate licensure in all jurisdictions where patients receive care.

(Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Telemedicine Technologies in the Practice of Medicine (2014), available here).

Read more
https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2019-02-12 21:06:542019-02-12 21:06:54Telehealth: Practicing Across the Idaho Border

Medical Record Retention Guidelines

February 5, 2019/in Providers

By Melissa Lou, Kim Stanger, and Christopher Mack

Clients frequently ask us how long they should retain medical records and related business records.  The answer depends on various factors, including the type of record, applicable regulatory and contract requirements, and the provider’s risk tolerance and resources.  Nevertheless, state record retention guides may be valuable to clients as they consider their internal policies.  The Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming state charts below are intended as a guideline.  Providers should confirm laws that may apply in their particular state, or that may apply to their particular situation. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2019-02-05 22:06:512019-02-05 22:06:51Medical Record Retention Guidelines

Identifying Business Associates: Make Sure You Have BAAs in Place

January 23, 2019/in HIPAA

by Kim Stanger

Failing to have HIPAA business associate agreements (“BAAs”) can result in significant penalties for healthcare providers and business associates. Last month, the OCR imposed a $500,000 settlement and robust corrective action plan against a physician group that failed to have a BAA with its billing company. After the billing company improperly allowed access to protected health information on its website, the OCR looked to the physician group to pay the price. (See https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2018/12/04/florida-contractor-physicians-group-shares-protected-health-information-unknown-vendor-without.html).

Under HIPAA, “business associates” are essentially those entities who create, access, maintain or transmit PHI on behalf of a healthcare provider. (45 CFR § 160.103, definition of “business associate”). HIPAA requires healthcare providers to execute a BAA before disclosing protected health information (“PHI”) to their business associate. (45 CFR § 164.502(e)). It also requires business associates to execute a BAA with their subcontractors who handle PHI on behalf of the business associate. (Id.). The BAA must contain certain required terms. As recent settlements confirm, healthcare providers who fail to execute a BAA are subject to HIPAA penalties and may be vicariously liable for their business associate’s misconduct.

Read more
https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2019-01-23 19:12:272019-01-23 19:12:27Identifying Business Associates: Make Sure You Have BAAs in Place
Page 24 of 46«‹2223242526›»

Idaho Patient Act Timeline


View our Idaho Patient Act Timeline Guide

Holland & Hart

This blog is maintained by the Health Law practice group of Holland & Hart LLP. Visit the Holland & Hart website.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Enter your Email:

Contact

If you have any questions, please contact Kim Stanger.

More COVID-19 Articles


View more COVID-related articles on our Labor & Employment Blog

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright 2025 | Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold WordPress Theme by Kriesi
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top