Holland & Hart's Health Law Blog
  • Publications
  • Webinar Recordings
    • 2026 Webinar Recordings
    • 2025 Webinar Recordings
    • 2024 Webinar Recordings
    • 2023 Webinar Recordings
    • 2022 Webinar Recordings
    • 2021 Webinar Recordings
    • 2020 Webinar Recordings
    • 2019 Webinar Recordings
    • 2018 Webinar Recordings
    • 2017 Webinar Recordings
    • 2016 Webinar Recordings
  • Compliance Bootcamps
  • Attorneys
  • Healthcare Law
  • Employers’ Lawyers Blog
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Archive for category: Stark

Correcting Stark Violations: 90-Day Grace Period

September 2, 2025/in Stark

By Kim Stanger

Physicians and entities to which physicians refer may violate the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (“Stark”) by mistakenly overpaying or underpaying amounts due under a compensation arrangement. For example, a hospital may undercharge a physician for rent, or a referring physician may receive payments in excess of his or her contract with a hospital due to a bookkeeping error. Because Stark is a strict liability statute, even minor unintentional mistakes can result in major penalties.  Fortunately, however, Stark establishes a grace period for parties to remedy overpayments and underpayments and avoid Stark penalties.

The Stark Problem.

Stark generally prohibits a physician from referring certain designated health services (DHS) payable by Medicare or Medicaid to an entity with which the physician has a financial relationship unless the transaction is structured to fit a relevant safe harbor. (42 USC § 1395nn; 42 CFR § 411.353(a)).  Stark affects many common financial relationships between physicians and DHS providers, including contracts for services, leases, directorships, loans, purchases, etc.  It applies to financial relationships between the physician and other entities billing for the physician’s services, including hospitals, employers, and even their own group practices.  Many of the common safe harbors applicable to such arrangements require that the compensation paid to or by the physician be set forth in a written agreement and represent fair market value.  (See, e.g., 42 CFR § 411.357 (a), (b), and (d)).  Problems may arise when the physician pays or is paid more or less than the contracted amount, either intentionally or by mistake.  Such actions will almost certainly cause the arrangement to fall outside the applicable compensation safe harbors, thereby subjecting the parties to Stark penalties, including prohibitions on billing, repayments, civil monetary penalties, and potential False Claims Act Liability.  (See 42 CFR § 411.353(b)-(d)). Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2025-09-02 14:52:282025-11-10 14:54:00Correcting Stark Violations: 90-Day Grace Period

FMV for Provider Contracts: Regulatory Standards

August 22, 2024/in Anti-Kickback, Stark

By Kim Stanger

As a general rule, healthcare employers are required to pay employed physicians and other contracted providers fair market value (FMV) for their services, but many employers do not understand relevant regulatory standards. In this health law update, we summarize Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute considerations.

I. STARK (PHYSICIANS AND PHYSICIAN FAMILY MEMBERS).

The federal Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (aka Stark) prohibits physicians1 from referring certain designated health services (DHS)2 payable by Medicare or Medicaid to entities with which the physician or a family member of the physician has a financial relationship unless the arrangement is structured to fit within a statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor.3 Violations may result in significant penalties.4 Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2024-08-22 13:47:472024-08-26 13:50:02FMV for Provider Contracts: Regulatory Standards

Directed Referrals: New Stark Rules

March 25, 2021/in Stark

By Kim Stanger

Under the federal Stark law, hospitals and other healthcare employers may require that employed or contracted physicians refer items or services to the hospital or another designated provider subject to certain limits. (42 CFR § 411.354(d)(4); see https://www.hollandhart.com/requiring-referrals-from-employees-and-contractors). Effective January 19, 2021, CMS modified the rules for such directed referral requirements in physician agreements. If they have not done so, hospitals and other providers will need to update their physician agreements if they want to require employed or contracted physicians to refer designated health services to the employer. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-03-25 13:03:342021-03-25 13:03:34Directed Referrals: New Stark Rules

New Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute Comparisons

December 7, 2020/in Anti-Kickback, Stark

By Kim Stanger, J. Malcolm DeVoy, and Amber Ellis

On November 20, 2020, CMS and the OIG published their much anticipated amendments to the federal Stark and Anti-Kickback laws. As summarized in our recent client alert, the changes open the door to value-based contracting with potential referral sources. They also modify existing regulations and create new safe harbors applicable to provider relationships.

Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2020-12-07 21:23:202020-12-07 21:23:20New Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute Comparisons

Final Rules for Stark and Anti-Kickback Reforms Issued by CMS and OIG

November 23, 2020/in Anti-Kickback, Stark

By Amber Ellis and J. Malcolm DeVoy

On November 20, 2020 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued two final rules to modernize and clarify the Physician Self-Referral regulations (the Stark Law, or Stark) and the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) safe harbor regulations. These new final rules generally take effect on January 19, 2021.

The prior Stark and AKS regulations were developed in a volume-based health care delivery and payment system. Over time, and with the rise of data that could be used by providers and payers to better anticipate patient needs and payment for them, concern arose that the existing regulations and policies would potentially inhibit the innovation necessary for moving toward a value-based system of care and payment. These new final rules aim to alleviate those concerns and advance the transition to value-based care and encourage the coordination of care among providers, while continuing to provide important safeguards to protect against fraud, abuse, and overutilization. Read more

https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2020-11-23 18:52:122020-11-23 18:52:12Final Rules for Stark and Anti-Kickback Reforms Issued by CMS and OIG
Page 1 of 212

Idaho Patient Act Timeline


View our Idaho Patient Act Timeline Guide

Holland & Hart

This blog is maintained by the Health Law practice group of Holland & Hart LLP. Visit the Holland & Hart website.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Enter your Email:

Contact

If you have any questions, please contact Kim Stanger.

More COVID-19 Articles


View more COVID-related articles on our Labor & Employment Blog

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright 2026 | Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold WordPress Theme by Kriesi
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top