Navigating Utah’s Expanded Peer Review Privilege: A Roadmap for Healthcare Providers

By Kristy M. Kimball

The term “peer review privilege” generally refers to a discovery and evidentiary privilege that can be asserted by hospitals and other healthcare entities to protect the confidentiality of credentialing, quality improvement, and similar peer review activities. While the specific scope, application, and requirements of the peer review privilege vary by state, the underlying purpose is consistent: to foster a protected environment where healthcare professionals and institutions can engage in honest, constructive dialogue and conduct thorough inquiry aimed at improving patient care and clinical performance—without fear that such discussions or findings will be used against them in court.

To gain peer review privilege, healthcare institutions and professionals must ensure that their peer review processes strictly align with the requirements of their state’s peer review privilege laws. Otherwise, in a legal proceeding (e.g., a medical malpractice case involving an underlying incident for which a hospital conducted peer review), a judge may rule that peer review privilege is inapplicable and allow sensitive and unfavorable peer review information and documents to be introduced into evidence.  Accordingly, it is imperative for those involved to clearly understand their state’s peer review privilege laws. Read more

Physicians and Other Healthcare Providers: Beware “Eat What You Kill” Compensation Models

By Kim Stanger

Physicians and other healthcare providers often structure their group compensation formulas on an “eat what you kill” basis, i.e., a provider is paid based on the services he or she performs in addition to items or services they order, prescribe, refer, sell, etc. Such formulas must be reviewed, structured, or revised appropriately to ensure compliance with federal fraud and abuse laws, including Stark, the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), and the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act (EKRA). Read more

Gifts to Patients and Referring Providers

By Kim Stanger

At this time of year, healthcare providers may want to give gifts to patients, referring providers, or other sources of business, but such gifts may violate federal and state fraud and abuse laws and result in civil or criminal fines for both the giver and receiver. Read more

Small Win for Healthcare Providers: CMS Issues New Guidance under No Surprise Billing Rules and DHHS’ Appeal

By Allison (Ally) Kjellander and Kim Stanger

On April 12, 2022, CMS issued new guidance1 for the independent dispute resolution (“IDR”) process under the No Surprise Billing Rules (“Rules”) in response to a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas judge vacating an insurer-friendly provision,2 handing a small win to healthcare providers. Read more

No Surprise Billing Rules: Good Faith Estimates and Unscheduled Services

By Kim Stanger

The No Surprise Billing Rules took effect January 1, 2022, but many questions remain, including if and to what extent the new rules for good faith estimates apply to items or services that are provided to self-pay patients on an unscheduled basis, such as emergency, urgent care, or walk-in patients. Read more