No More EMTALA Exception to Idaho’s Total Abortion Ban

By Kim Stanger

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ended the EMTALA exception to Idaho’s total abortion ban, I.C. 18-622.

In 2022, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the state of Idaho, claiming that EMTALA preempted the total abortion ban in emergency cases. The federal district court of Idaho entered a preliminary injunction staying Idaho’s enforcement of its total abortion ban in EMTALA cases pending final resolution of the case.  (See our August 26, 2022, Health Law Update.) However, on September 28, 2023, the Ninth Circuit overruled the district court, holding that an intervening decision by the Idaho Supreme Court and Idaho’s amendment to the total abortion ban in 2023 mitigated, to a large extent, the concerns raised by the district court. Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit stayed the district court’s injunction, thereby ending the EMTALA exception to the total abortion ban pending a final decision in the district court case. A copy of the Ninth Circuit decision may be accessed hereRead more

Idaho’s New Essential Caregiver Visitation Law

by Cameron McCue

Idaho implemented a new law that gives people receiving in-person healthcare services the right to be visited by essential caregivers of their choosing under certain conditions. I.C. § 39-9802. The law, which became effective July 1, 2023, requires healthcare and assisted living facilities to allow patients to have in-person visitation from an essential caregiver even if other visitors are being excluded by the facility. I.C. § 39-9803. The new law supplements requirements that hospitals, long-term care facilities, and certain other institutional providers already have under licensure regulations or Medicare conditions of participation.

The law defines “essential caregiver” as “a person or persons designated by a patient or resident to visit the patient or resident in person at a facility.” I.C. § 39-9801(2). Healthcare facilities have certain obligations under the new law beyond just allowing patients to have in-person visitation from an essential caregiver. Facilities must (1) when practicable, notify potential patients or residents of their right to designate essential caregivers prior to admission to the facility; (2) provide patients or residents an opportunity to designate their essential caregivers; and (3) within certain limits, accommodate patient requests to have essential caregivers visit. Read more

Referrals for Out-of-State Abortions: New Idaho Decision

By Kim Stanger

The federal District Court of Idaho has issued a ruling that will help protect physicians and other healthcare providers who refer patients outside of Idaho for an abortion.

As we have previously discussed (see https://www.hollandhart.com/idahos-amended-abortion-laws-summary-and-updated-faqs), Idaho’s criminal abortion ban prohibits “assist[ing] in performing or attempting to perform an abortion.”  (I.C. 18-622(2)).  On March 27, 2023, Idaho Attorney General Labrador issued a letter (the “Crane Letter”) to a legislator in which he opined: Read more

Consent for Treatment of Minors in Idaho

By Kim Stanger

In Idaho, persons under the age of 18 (“minors”) may consent to their own healthcare in only limited circumstances.1

General Rule: Obtain Consent from Parent or Surrogate Decision Maker. Idaho Code § 39‑4503 sets forth the general standard for determining whether a person is competent to consent to their own healthcare:

Any person … who comprehends the need for, the nature of and the significant risks ordinarily inherent in any contemplated health care services is competent to consent thereto on his or her own behalf.

Read more

The Idaho Medical Consent Act: Recent Amendments

By Kim Stanger

The Idaho legislature has amended Idaho’s Medical Consent Act.  The redlined changes are shown here.  Effective July 1, 2023, the rules for medical consents in Idaho are as follows:

1. Need for Informed Consent. As a general rule, a healthcare provider or entity must have informed consent from a competent patient or their authorized surrogate decision-maker to provide healthcare. Failure to obtain sufficiently informed consent may subject the provider to liability for civil, administrative, and potentially criminal penalties.  In addition to malpractice, assault, or other common causes of action, Idaho recognizes a specific tort cause of action for lack of informed consent.1 Read more