Holland & Hart's Health Law Blog
  • Publications
  • Webinar Recordings
    • 2026 Webinar Recordings
    • 2025 Webinar Recordings
    • 2024 Webinar Recordings
    • 2023 Webinar Recordings
    • 2022 Webinar Recordings
    • 2021 Webinar Recordings
    • 2020 Webinar Recordings
    • 2019 Webinar Recordings
    • 2018 Webinar Recordings
    • 2017 Webinar Recordings
    • 2016 Webinar Recordings
  • Compliance Bootcamps
  • Attorneys
  • Healthcare Law
  • Employers’ Lawyers Blog
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Blog Article

Idaho Passes Direct Primary Care Act

May 7, 2015/in Physician Practices

by Melissa Starry, Holland & Hart LLP

Direct Primary Care (“DPC”) is increasing in popularity in the United States as an alternative payment model for primary care medical services. Instead of fee-for-service insurance billing, typically a DPC medical provider enters into an agreement with its patients and charges its patients a monthly, quarterly, or annual fee that covers all or most primary care services. Given the fact that a DPC medical provider takes on a certain amount of risk in agreeing to provide primary care services to patients for a fixed amount (regardless of how often a patient is seen by the provider), there were concerns that such an arrangement could be interpreted under Idaho law as the provision of insurance. With the passage of the Idaho Direct Medical Care Act1 (the “Act”), and subsequent signing by Governor Butch Otter, Idaho is now the ninth state in the country to pass legislation to ensure that DPC medical providers are not treated as insurance products by state regulators.

Physicians providing DPC services to patients must comply with the following requirements under the Act:

  1. Direct Care Agreements. Under the Act, patients and physicians must enter into “Direct Care Agreements.”2 Direct Care Agreements must be in writing and identify the following information:
    1. The medical provider and the patient;
    2. The general scope of services as well as the specific services to be provided by the medical provider;
    3. The location or locations where services are to be provided and whether out-of-office services are included;
    4. The amount of the direct fee and the time interval at which it is to be paid; and
    5. The term of the Direct Care Agreement and the conditions upon which it may be terminated by the medical provider. The Direct Care Agreement must be terminable at will by written notice from the patient to the medical provider.
  2. Refund Upon Termination. If either party provides notice of termination of the Direct Care Agreement, the medical provider must refund to the patient all unearned direct fees within thirty (30) days following the notice of termination. “Unearned” is not defined by the statute, so it would be advisable to include language in the Direct Care Agreement addressing this issue.
  3. Required Disclaimer. The Direct Care Agreement must include the following disclaimer: “This agreement does not provide comprehensive health insurance coverage. It provides only the services described herein. It is recommended that insurance be obtained to cover medical services not provided for under this direct care agreement.”3
  4. Sale or Transfer of Direct Care Agreements. The statute also provides that Direct Care Agreements may not be sold or transferred without the written consent of the other party. Because Direct Care Agreements are individual agreements between a medical provider and a patient, the agreements cannot be sold to a group, employer, or group of subscribers. The statute is clear, however, that it does not prohibit the presentation of marketing materials to groups of potential patients or their representatives.4
  5. Insurance Billing. A DPC medical provider is prohibited from billing an insurer for the services provided under a Direct Care Agreement. A patient may submit a request for reimbursement to an insurer if permitted under the patient’s insurance policy. DPC medical providers are not prohibited from submitting claims to insurance for services not provided under a Direct Care Agreement.5 The language of the Direct Care Agreements outlining the scope of services provided is incredibly important for this reason.

By removing a potential barrier to starting a DPC practice, the legislature affirmed its support for personal responsibility and “cost-effective delivery of medical services by encouraging innovative use of direct patient-provider practices for primary and specialty medical care.”6

If you would like additional information regarding DPC practices in Idaho, general business formation questions, or assistance in drafting Direct Care Agreements, please contact the health care practice group at Holland & Hart:

Kim C. Stanger
kcstanger@hollandhart.com
(208) 383-3913

Melissa M. Starry
mmstarry@hollandhart.com
(208) 383-3984


This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.


1See S.B. 1062; to be codified at Idaho Code § 39-9201 et seq.
2Id. at § 9204.
3Id. at § 9207.
4Id. at § 9208.
5Id. at § 9205.
6Id. at § 9202.

Share this entry
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://hhhealthlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2015-05-07 08:15:172015-05-07 08:15:17Idaho Passes Direct Primary Care Act

Idaho Patient Act Timeline


View our Idaho Patient Act Timeline Guide

Holland & Hart

This blog is maintained by the Health Law practice group of Holland & Hart LLP. Visit the Holland & Hart website.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Enter your Email:

Contact

If you have any questions, please contact Kim Stanger.

More COVID-19 Articles


View more COVID-related articles on our Labor & Employment Blog

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright 2026 | Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold WordPress Theme by Kriesi
Link to: New OIG Guidance Emphasizes Health Care Compliance Oversight for Boards Link to: New OIG Guidance Emphasizes Health Care Compliance Oversight for Boards New OIG Guidance Emphasizes Health Care Compliance Oversight for Boards Link to: HIPAA, E-mails, and Texts to Patients or Others Link to: HIPAA, E-mails, and Texts to Patients or Others HIPAA, E-mails, and Texts to Patients or Others
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top